Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the consensus on COVID-19 origins by end of 2025?
Natural spillover confirmed • 25%
Lab origin confirmed • 25%
Inconclusive evidence • 25%
Other • 25%
Consensus statements from major health organizations like WHO, CDC, or peer-reviewed publications
Crits-Christoph Study Links COVID-19 Origins to Wuhan Market, Raccoon Dog DNA Found
Sep 19, 2024, 05:31 PM
A new scientific paper by Crits-Christoph et al., published in the journal Cell, has sparked significant debate regarding the origins of COVID-19. The study presents genetic evidence suggesting that the coronavirus pandemic most likely originated from a natural spillover from animals sold in the Huanan market in Wuhan, China. This conclusion is supported by the presence of raccoon dog DNA in the market samples. However, the paper has faced criticism for its methodology and conclusions. Some scientists, including those from the Proximal Origin group, have refuted the study's findings, arguing that the pandemic started with Lineage A, while early market cases were all Lineage B. Additionally, there are calls for an investigation into the paper for potential scientific misconduct, with concerns raised about sampling bias and errors in the phylogenetic tree. The publication has also been linked to Kristian Anderson, a scientist who previously suggested in private that the virus could have come from a lab, but publicly supported the natural spillover theory.
View original story
Natural spillover from animals to humans • 25%
Laboratory leak • 25%
Other natural source • 25%
No consensus reached • 25%
Natural spillover from animals at Huanan Market • 25%
Laboratory leak • 25%
Other natural origin • 25%
Unknown • 25%
Wuhan Market Animal Origin • 25%
Laboratory Leak • 25%
Other Natural Origin • 25%
Still Undetermined • 25%
Wuhan market animals • 25%
Lab leak • 25%
Zoonotic spillover from another source • 25%
Other • 25%
Wuhan Market Animals • 25%
Laboratory Origin • 25%
Other Natural Source • 25%
Unknown • 25%
Lab Leak • 25%
Natural Origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Supports animal origin theory • 25%
Supports lab leak theory • 25%
Supports new theory • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Lab origin • 25%
Natural origin • 25%
Unsure/No opinion • 25%
Other theories • 25%
Confirms lab leak • 25%
Refutes lab leak • 25%
Calls for more research • 25%
No definitive conclusion • 25%
Strongly Agree • 25%
Somewhat Agree • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Disagree • 25%
Majority believe U.S. lab origin • 25%
Majority believe Chinese lab origin • 25%
Majority believe natural origin • 25%
Majority remain undecided • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Paper upheld without changes • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Paper revised • 25%
Paper retracted • 25%