Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will the next major study on COVID-19 origins conclude by mid-2025?
Supports animal origin theory • 25%
Supports lab leak theory • 25%
Supports new theory • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Peer-reviewed journals or publications
New Study by Crits-Christoph Links COVID-19 Origin to Wuhan Market Animals with 800 Samples
Sep 20, 2024, 02:13 AM
A new study published in the journal 'Cell' by Crits-Christoph et al. has provided substantial evidence supporting the theory that the COVID-19 pandemic originated from animals sold at the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan, China. The research, which analyzed over 800 environmental samples collected from the market, identified genetic material from raccoon dogs and civet cats in stalls that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. This study reinforces the hypothesis that the virus likely spilled over from animals to humans in late 2019, specifically around mid-November 2019. The findings contradict previous claims and suggest that the pandemic most likely began with Lineage A of the virus, although early cases were identified as Lineage B. Scientists involved in the study assert that it is now 'beyond reasonable doubt' that the pandemic started with infected animals sold at the market rather than from a laboratory leak. The researchers also indicated that there could have been two or more spillover events.
View original story
Supports natural spillover theory • 25%
Supports lab leak theory • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Supports natural spillover • 25%
Supports lab origin • 25%
Inconclusive or mixed results • 25%
No significant new studies • 25%
Lab Leak • 25%
Natural Origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Natural spillover confirmed • 25%
Lab origin confirmed • 25%
Inconclusive evidence • 25%
Other • 25%
U.S. lab origin confirmed • 25%
Chinese lab origin confirmed • 25%
Natural origin confirmed • 25%
Origin remains inconclusive • 25%
Supports zoonotic spillover • 25%
Supports lab origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No investigation • 25%
New animal host identified • 25%
New genetic evidence supporting animal origin • 25%
New evidence supporting laboratory origin • 25%
Other • 25%
Confirms lab leak • 25%
Refutes lab leak • 25%
Calls for more research • 25%
No definitive conclusion • 25%
Yes, WHO • 25%
Yes, CDC • 25%
Yes, other • 25%
No • 25%
Strongly Agree • 25%
Somewhat Agree • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Disagree • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Bats • 25%
Raccoon dogs • 25%
Other • 25%
Civet cats • 25%