Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill new evidence supporting lab origin of COVID-19 be published by June 2025?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal or official statements from credible health organizations
Crits-Christoph Study Links COVID-19 Origins to Wuhan Market, Raccoon Dog DNA Found
Sep 19, 2024, 05:31 PM
A new scientific paper by Crits-Christoph et al., published in the journal Cell, has sparked significant debate regarding the origins of COVID-19. The study presents genetic evidence suggesting that the coronavirus pandemic most likely originated from a natural spillover from animals sold in the Huanan market in Wuhan, China. This conclusion is supported by the presence of raccoon dog DNA in the market samples. However, the paper has faced criticism for its methodology and conclusions. Some scientists, including those from the Proximal Origin group, have refuted the study's findings, arguing that the pandemic started with Lineage A, while early market cases were all Lineage B. Additionally, there are calls for an investigation into the paper for potential scientific misconduct, with concerns raised about sampling bias and errors in the phylogenetic tree. The publication has also been linked to Kristian Anderson, a scientist who previously suggested in private that the virus could have come from a lab, but publicly supported the natural spillover theory.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Supports zoonotic spillover • 25%
Supports lab origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No investigation • 25%
USA • 25%
China • 25%
World Health Organization (WHO) • 25%
Other • 25%
Lab Leak • 25%
Natural Origin • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Supports natural spillover theory • 25%
Supports lab leak theory • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Strongly Agree • 25%
Somewhat Agree • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Disagree • 25%
Supports animal origin theory • 25%
Supports lab leak theory • 25%
Supports new theory • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
New animal host identified • 25%
New genetic evidence supporting animal origin • 25%
New evidence supporting laboratory origin • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Inconclusive evidence • 25%
Other • 25%
Natural spillover confirmed • 25%
Lab origin confirmed • 25%
Paper upheld without changes • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Paper revised • 25%
Paper retracted • 25%