Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill Crits-Christoph et al. paper be investigated for scientific misconduct by end of 2024?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Public statements or reports from scientific journals, research institutions, or relevant authorities
Crits-Christoph Study Links COVID-19 Origins to Wuhan Market, Raccoon Dog DNA Found
Sep 19, 2024, 05:31 PM
A new scientific paper by Crits-Christoph et al., published in the journal Cell, has sparked significant debate regarding the origins of COVID-19. The study presents genetic evidence suggesting that the coronavirus pandemic most likely originated from a natural spillover from animals sold in the Huanan market in Wuhan, China. This conclusion is supported by the presence of raccoon dog DNA in the market samples. However, the paper has faced criticism for its methodology and conclusions. Some scientists, including those from the Proximal Origin group, have refuted the study's findings, arguing that the pandemic started with Lineage A, while early market cases were all Lineage B. Additionally, there are calls for an investigation into the paper for potential scientific misconduct, with concerns raised about sampling bias and errors in the phylogenetic tree. The publication has also been linked to Kristian Anderson, a scientist who previously suggested in private that the virus could have come from a lab, but publicly supported the natural spillover theory.
View original story
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Study Upheld • 25%
Study Retracted • 25%
Expression of Concern Issued • 25%
Other Outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Widely accepted • 25%
Partially accepted • 25%
Widely refuted • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
No Misconduct Found • 25%
Minor Issues Found • 25%
Major Misconduct Found • 25%
Investigation Inconclusive • 25%
Study published • 25%
NIH takes action • 25%
Congressional hearing held • 25%
No significant outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Inconclusive evidence • 25%
Other • 25%
Natural spillover confirmed • 25%
Lab origin confirmed • 25%
Paper upheld without changes • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Paper revised • 25%
Paper retracted • 25%