What will be the public response to the investigation findings on Baltic Sea cable damage?
Majority accepts accidental explanation • 25%
Majority suspects Russian involvement • 25%
Majority suspects other causes • 25%
Public opinion remains divided • 25%
Public opinion polls or major news outlet reports
Washington Post: Intel Officials Say Baltic Cable Damage Was Accidental, Not Russian Sabotage
Jan 19, 2025, 02:45 PM
U.S. and European intelligence officials have concluded that the recent damages to undersea cables in the Baltic Sea were likely caused by maritime accidents rather than Russian sabotage, according to reports by the Washington Post. Investigations have found no evidence linking Russia to the incidents and suggest that the ships involved did not act intentionally or under Moscow's direction. The emerging consensus among security services indicates that unintentional actions by ships, possibly involving dragging anchors, led to the damage. The ship 'Eagle S' has been mentioned in connection with one of the cable ruptures. However, some officials and experts express skepticism over the accident explanation. Pekka Toveri, a Finnish official, described the idea that the damage was accidental as 'absolute nonsense'.
View original story
Accidental damage confirmed • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Sabotage confirmed • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Increased security measures • 25%
Joint EU investigation • 25%
Sabotage confirmed • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Natural causes • 25%
Technical failure • 25%
Vessel involvement confirmed • 25%
Sabotage confirmed • 25%
Technical fault confirmed • 25%
No conclusive cause • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Germany • 25%
France • 25%
United States • 25%
Other • 25%
Resolved without conviction • 25%
Closed without resolution • 25%
Ongoing investigation • 25%
Resolved with conviction • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Accidental digging • 25%
Sabotage • 25%
Natural causes • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Confirmed accidental damage • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Confirmed sabotage by foreign entity • 25%
Inconclusive results • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Sabotage confirmed • 25%
Accidental damage • 25%
Natural causes • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increased maritime security measures • 25%
Other policy changes • 25%
Collaboration on international security protocols • 25%
No significant changes • 25%