Market
Primary focus of U.S. interest in Greenland by end of 2025?
2
Dmitry Medvedev•Russian•United States•Canada•Greenland•Britain•Donald Trump•Elon Musk•Medvedev•Trump•Arctic
Resolution / Starting Odds
Strategic military presence • 25%
Natural resource exploration • 25%
Environmental research • 25%
Other • 25%
Analysis of U.S. government statements and policy actions reported by credible news outlets
Story
Medvedev Suggests Trump and Musk Buy Greenland Instead of U.S. Annexation; Population 56,000, Total Cost $56 Billion
Dec 29, 2024, 11:49 PM
Dmitry Medvedev, a senior Russian official, has suggested that rather than the United States annexing territories like Canada, Greenland, or Britain, private individuals such as Donald Trump and Elon Musk could purchase these lands. Medvedev's comments highlight the ongoing discourse surrounding U.S. interest in Greenland, which has been reignited by President-elect Trump's recent remarks about the territory. The leader of Greenland has since clarified that the island is not for sale. Discussions about U.S. ownership of Greenland have included considerations of its strategic importance in the Arctic, with various commentators emphasizing its potential role in U.S. national security. Some have even proposed financial incentives, suggesting that the U.S. could offer $1 million to each of Greenland's approximately 56,000 residents to facilitate such a transition, amounting to a total cost of $56 billion. This proposal reflects a broader interest in the Arctic region, which is increasingly viewed as a battleground for power and resources.
View original story
Similar markets
Rare earth minerals • 25%
Oil and gas exploration • 25%
Trade route access • 25%
Military strategic positioning • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic investment • 25%
Military expansion • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Strategic positioning • 25%
Economic interests • 25%
National security • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Resource exploration • 25%
Military presence • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Economic agreements without territorial change • 25%
Greenland becomes part of the U.S. • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
National Security • 25%
Economic Interests • 25%
Other • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Influence over Russia/China • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%
Other • 25%
Shipping routes • 25%
Military presence • 25%
Environmental research projects • 25%
Military base expansion • 25%
Trade agreements with Denmark • 25%
No significant initiatives • 25%
Other • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
Interest officially dropped • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
No change in status • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
Formal negotiations start • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Diplomatic Negotiation • 25%
No Action • 25%
Economic investments • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%