U.S. strategic initiatives in Greenland by end of 2025
Military base expansion • 25%
Environmental research projects • 25%
Trade agreements with Denmark • 25%
No significant initiatives • 25%
Official announcements from the U.S. government or credible news sources
Trump Calls for U.S. Purchase of Greenland, Citing 'Absolute Necessity' for Ownership and Control, Announces Ken Howery as Ambassador
Dec 23, 2024, 03:46 AM
President-elect Donald Trump has reiterated his call for the United States to purchase Greenland, emphasizing that ownership is crucial for national security and freedom. In a statement, Trump declared, "For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity." This announcement coincided with his nomination of Ken Howery as the U.S. ambassador to Denmark. Trump's remarks reflect a long-standing interest in Greenland, which he previously attempted to acquire during his presidency in 2019. The emphasis on Greenland's ownership aligns with broader strategic interests, as Trump has also suggested that the U.S. could reclaim control of the Panama Canal.
View original story
No significant actions • 25%
Economic investments • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Military expansion • 25%
Economic investment • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Diplomatic Agreement • 25%
No Action • 25%
Oil and gas exploration • 25%
Rare earth minerals • 25%
Military strategic positioning • 25%
Trade route access • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Greenland becomes part of the U.S. • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Economic agreements without territorial change • 25%
Environmental research • 25%
Strategic military presence • 25%
Natural resource exploration • 25%
Other • 25%
Defense agreement • 25%
No major step • 25%
Economic partnership • 25%
Mining cooperation • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Supportive of sale • 25%
Opposed to sale • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Resource exploration • 25%
Military presence • 25%
Other • 25%
No change • 25%
Decreased presence • 25%
Increased presence • 25%
New strategic agreements • 25%
Increased NATO presence • 25%
No significant military changes • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Increased Russian presence • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Military actions • 25%
Economic actions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No response • 25%
Negotiate • 25%
Accept • 25%
Reject • 25%