Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be Russia's response to U.S. interest in Greenland by the end of 2025?
Condemnation • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Military posturing • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements from the Russian government or credible news reports
Trump Eyes Greenland for Trillions in Minerals; Denmark Open to Talks, Greenland Insists on Deciding Future
Jan 13, 2025, 06:36 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has reiterated his interest in acquiring Greenland, citing the island's strategic location and rich mineral resources vital for national security. Trump's national security adviser, Waltz, stated that the President-elect is ready to consider all possible options regarding Greenland, including the "force scenario." Trump believes that the United States needs Greenland to gain insight into Russia and China and access to trillions of dollars' worth of rare minerals necessary for the modern economy. In response, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen expressed Denmark's readiness to discuss legitimate American security interests in the Arctic with the incoming administration. Greenland's Prime Minister Mute Egede emphasized that Greenland will decide its own future but is open to enhancing cooperation with the U.S., especially in mining. Meanwhile, Danish intelligence accused Russia of influencing Trump's interest in Greenland, alleging that Russia suggested the idea to him and forged documents indicating Greenland's intent to pursue independence. Greenland holds significant reserves of rare earth minerals, estimated at 1.5 million tonnes, contributing to the geopolitical interest from global powers. The situation underscores the growing geopolitical significance of the Arctic region, with concerns over Russia's military activity and China's ambitions for Greenland's resources.
View original story
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Support • 25%
NATO supports Denmark • 25%
No significant international action • 25%
EU issues sanctions against U.S. • 25%
UN intervenes diplomatically • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
Increased cooperation without sale • 25%
No response • 25%
Rejection of sale • 25%
Negotiation for sale • 25%
Remain Neutral • 25%
Support U.S. Offer • 25%
Oppose U.S. Offer • 25%
No Official Statement • 25%
Military cooperation • 25%
Increased diplomatic engagement • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Economic agreements • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Diplomatic Agreement • 25%
No Action • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Economic agreements without territorial change • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Greenland becomes part of the U.S. • 25%
No action • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
Economic incentives • 25%
Military actions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic actions • 25%
Other • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Influence over Russia/China • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%