Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international response to U.S. demand for Greenland by end of 2025?
NATO supports Denmark • 25%
EU issues sanctions against U.S. • 25%
UN intervenes diplomatically • 25%
No significant international action • 25%
Statements from NATO, the European Union, or other international organizations, news reports
Trump Demands Greenland from Denmark for National Security, Citing Strategic Value Against China and Russia
Jan 7, 2025, 05:20 PM
President Donald Trump has stated that the United States needs Greenland for national security purposes, emphasizing its strategic value in countering threats from China and Russia. Trump questioned Denmark's legal right to Greenland, suggesting that if such a right exists, Denmark should relinquish it to protect the 'free world'. He also threatened to impose high tariffs on Denmark if they do not comply with his demands regarding Greenland.
View original story
No official response • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Other • 25%
Support • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Opposed • 25%
No official response • 25%
Opposed • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Broad international support • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Mixed international reactions • 25%
Broad international opposition • 25%
Denmark agrees • 25%
Greenland rejects • 25%
Greenland agrees • 25%
Denmark rejects • 25%
Support from NATO members • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Opposition from EU members • 25%
Support from major countries • 25%
Neutral stance from major countries • 25%
Opposition from major countries • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No response • 25%
Increased cooperation without sale • 25%
Negotiation for sale • 25%
Rejection of sale • 25%
Diplomatic Agreement • 25%
Military Action • 25%
No Action • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
No significant military changes • 25%
Increased Russian presence • 25%
Increased NATO presence • 25%