What will be the outcome of U.S. diplomatic efforts for Greenland by end of 2025?
Greenland agrees to negotiations • 25%
Denmark agrees to negotiations • 25%
Both reject negotiations • 25%
Other diplomatic outcome • 25%
Official announcements from relevant governments or credible international news outlets
Trump Cites Monroe Doctrine in Renewed Push for Greenland Amid Arctic Geopolitical Tensions
Jan 20, 2025, 01:14 PM
Donald Trump, the incoming U.S. president, has reignited his controversial interest in acquiring Greenland, a territory under Denmark's control. Trump has described the acquisition as essential for U.S. national security and the protection of the free world, citing the Monroe Doctrine to justify his stance. Greenland, the world's largest island, is geopolitically significant due to its location in the Arctic and its vast natural resources, including oil, gas, and rare earth minerals. The melting ice caused by climate change has made these resources more accessible and opened new commercial and military navigation routes. Denmark and Greenland have firmly rejected the idea, with Greenland's Prime Minister Múte Egede emphasizing the island's autonomy and stating, 'We are not for sale.' Trump's renewed push for Greenland has drawn criticism from European leaders, with parallels being drawn to Russia's annexation of Ukrainian territories. The Danish government has expressed concerns about the potential for a diplomatic crisis, while Greenland's residents remain skeptical of U.S. intentions. The proposal also raises environmental concerns, as the exploitation of Greenland's resources could exacerbate climate change. Additionally, China's and Russia's influence in the Arctic, as well as the longstanding presence of a U.S. military base in Greenland, have added layers of complexity to the issue. Trump's broader expansionist rhetoric includes aspirations to reassert U.S. control over the Panama Canal and annex Canada, further fueling international tensions.
View original story
Economic agreements • 25%
Formal acquisition negotiations • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No significant change • 25%
No significant change • 34%
Increased cooperation without purchase • 33%
Formal purchase proposal • 33%
No official outcome • 25%
Greenland rejects negotiations • 25%
Denmark intervenes • 25%
Greenland agrees to negotiations • 25%
Other diplomatic outcomes • 25%
Formal purchase proposal • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Strengthened relations • 25%
Tensions escalated • 25%
Other • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Denmark rejects the demand • 25%
Status quo remains • 25%
Denmark agrees to negotiations • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Negotiations initiated • 25%
Greenland remains under Danish control • 25%
Greenland is acquired by the US • 25%
Denmark agrees to lease parts of Greenland to the US • 25%
Proposal rejected • 25%
Denmark rejects offer • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Greenland joins the U.S. • 25%
Negotiations ongoing • 25%
Greenland acquisition successful • 25%
U.S. withdraws interest • 25%
Negotiations ongoing • 25%
Greenland acquisition rejected • 25%
No significant change • 25%
U.S. purchases Greenland • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%
Denmark rejects proposal • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
Formal negotiations start • 25%
Interest officially dropped • 25%
No change in status • 25%
Other • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
Denmark retains control without negotiations • 25%
US acquires Greenland • 25%
Negotiations continue without resolution • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
UN resolution against U.S. • 25%
Other international response • 25%
No major response • 25%
EU sanctions on U.S. • 25%