Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitHTS governance structure in Syria by end of 2025?
Democratic elections • 25%
Authoritarian rule • 25%
Transitional government • 25%
No new governance established • 25%
Official statements from HTS or credible news reports detailing the governance structure
Syrian Rebel Leader Al-Julani Declares No Conflict with Israel, Citing End of Iranian Forces, Plans Elections and Reconstruction
Dec 14, 2024, 04:11 PM
Abu Mohammad al-Julani, the leader of the Syrian rebel group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), stated that Syria will not engage in conflict with Israel, asserting that the reasons for Israeli intervention have dissipated following the departure of Iranian forces from the country. In his remarks, al-Julani emphasized that the current situation in Syria is too strained for further conflict and called for international intervention to address what he described as unjustified Israeli military actions. He also expressed a willingness to communicate with Western embassies, including discussions with Britain to restore diplomatic relations. Al-Julani highlighted that there is no hostility towards the Iranian community and reiterated that his administration's focus is on reconstruction and development rather than warfare. He confirmed plans for a new governance structure that would include elections and stated that the Syrian Ministry of Defense will dissolve all armed factions, ensuring that no weapons remain outside state control. Al-Julani's comments mark a significant shift in the leadership's approach to both internal governance and foreign relations.
View original story
Recognized as local authority • 25%
Recognized as government • 25%
Recognized as non-state actor • 25%
No recognition • 25%
Tribal governance model • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Federal governance model • 25%
National Army formation • 25%
HTS forms own government • 25%
HTS part of interim government • 25%
HTS excluded from government • 25%
Other role • 25%
Policy shift • 25%
No change • 25%
Both leadership and policy change • 25%
Leadership change • 25%
Military rule • 25%
Democratic governance • 25%
Islamist governance • 25%
Hybrid governance • 25%
International intervention • 25%
Loss of control to another group • 25%
Stable control over Syria • 25%
Partial control with ongoing conflicts • 25%
UN recognition • 25%
No recognition • 25%
Recognition by major powers (e.g., US, UK) • 25%
EU recognition • 25%
United Nations • 25%
European Union • 25%
No intervention • 25%
Arab League • 25%