Loading...
Market
What will be the outcome of U.S. diplomatic efforts with Denmark regarding Greenland in 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Strengthened relations • 25%
Tensions escalated • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Other • 25%
Official announcements from the U.S. or Danish governments or major news agencies
Story
JD Vance: No Military Force Needed for Greenland Due to US Troop Presence, Cites Strategic Importance and Natural Resources
Jan 12, 2025, 03:15 PM
Vice President-elect JD Vance has stated that the United States does not need to use military force to take control of Greenland, as American troops are already present there. Vance emphasized Greenland's strategic importance to the U.S., citing its natural resources and the need for American leadership in securing and developing these assets. He criticized the Danish government for not adequately securing Greenland, suggesting that there is an opportunity for the U.S. to take a leadership role. Vance's comments align with President-elect Donald Trump's views on Greenland's strategic value to American security interests.
View original story
Similar markets
Economic agreements • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
Formal acquisition negotiations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
No significant change • 25%
U.S. purchases Greenland • 25%
Denmark rejects proposal • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
Formal purchase proposal • 25%
Other diplomatic outcomes • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Denmark retains control without negotiations • 25%
US acquires Greenland • 25%
Negotiations continue without resolution • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Denmark intervenes • 25%
Greenland agrees to negotiations • 25%
Greenland rejects negotiations • 25%
No official outcome • 25%
Denmark rejects the demand • 25%
Denmark agrees to negotiations • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%
Status quo remains • 25%
Continued stalemate • 25%
Third-party mediation • 25%
Denmark strengthens defense of Greenland • 25%
U.S.-Denmark agreement on Greenland • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Greenland sold to U.S. • 25%
Denmark rejects U.S. proposal • 25%
U.S. expands military presence • 25%
Increased U.S. presence • 25%
Reduced U.S. presence • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Denmark increases own military presence • 25%
Firm rejection • 25%
Open to negotiations • 25%
Encourages Greenlandic decision • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Enhanced security agreement • 25%
No agreement reached • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Supportive • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Opposed • 25%