Loading...
Market
What will be the primary concern of Denmark regarding U.S. activities in Greenland in 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Sovereignty issues • 25%
Environmental impact • 25%
Economic implications • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements from the Danish government or analysis by major news outlets
Story
JD Vance: No Military Force Needed for Greenland Due to US Troop Presence, Cites Strategic Importance and Natural Resources
Jan 12, 2025, 03:15 PM
Vice President-elect JD Vance has stated that the United States does not need to use military force to take control of Greenland, as American troops are already present there. Vance emphasized Greenland's strategic importance to the U.S., citing its natural resources and the need for American leadership in securing and developing these assets. He criticized the Danish government for not adequately securing Greenland, suggesting that there is an opportunity for the U.S. to take a leadership role. Vance's comments align with President-elect Donald Trump's views on Greenland's strategic value to American security interests.
View original story
Similar markets
Economic agreements without territorial change • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Greenland becomes part of the U.S. • 25%
Encourages Greenlandic decision • 25%
Open to negotiations • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Firm rejection • 25%
Other reasons • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%
Influence over Russia/China • 25%
Increased diplomatic engagement • 25%
Military cooperation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Economic agreements • 25%
National Security • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Economic Interests • 25%
Opposed • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Environmental research • 25%
Strategic military presence • 25%
Natural resource exploration • 25%
Other • 25%
Military expansion • 25%
Environmental concerns • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic investment • 25%
Mineral resources • 25%
Shipping routes • 25%
Other • 25%
Military presence • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Diplomatic Negotiation • 25%
Military Action • 25%
No Action • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Denmark retains control without negotiations • 25%
Negotiations continue without resolution • 25%
US acquires Greenland • 25%