Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international response to Iran's support for dangerous groups by end of 2025?
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Military action taken • 25%
Diplomatic measures • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements from international bodies or major countries
Macron: Iran's Nuclear Program Nears Point of No Return; Urges Snapback Sanctions Before October 2025
Jan 6, 2025, 12:34 PM
French President Emmanuel Macron warned on Monday that Iran's nuclear program is nearing the point of no return, highlighting Tehran's acceleration of its nuclear activities as a main strategic and security challenge in the Middle East and beyond. Speaking during his annual address to ambassadors, Macron emphasized the need for strategic discussions with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration regarding Iran, suggesting that Western leaders may need to consider reimposing snapback sanctions before their expiration in October 2025. He also cited Iran's support for Russia's war against Ukraine, backing of dangerous groups in the region, and deployment of proxy forces to Africa as additional concerns.
View original story
Military action or intervention • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Military Intervention • 25%
Diplomatic Negotiations • 25%
No Significant Response • 25%
New Sanctions • 25%
Military actions • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No action taken • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation of Iran's claims • 25%
Support for Iran's claims • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Military action considered • 25%
Diplomatic efforts increased • 25%
EU sanctions on Iran • 25%
US diplomatic intervention • 25%
UN mediation • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Widespread support for Israel • 25%
Minimal international response • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Diplomatic pressure • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
EU diplomatic efforts • 25%
US sanctions • 25%
No international response • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
General support • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
No major response • 25%
Diplomatic actions • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other developments • 25%
Increased influence • 25%
Decreased influence • 25%