Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitOutcome of legal challenges to deportation by Dec 31, 2025?
Operation proceeds as planned • 25%
Operation delayed • 25%
Operation scaled down • 25%
Operation halted • 25%
Court rulings, official announcements, news reports
Texas Offers Trump Over 1,400 Acres in Starr County for January Mass Deportation Operation
Nov 20, 2024, 01:12 AM
Texas has offered President-elect Donald Trump over 1,400 acres of land in Starr County to support a large-scale deportation operation. The land, located near the U.S.-Mexico border, is intended to serve as a hub for the mass deportation efforts planned by the incoming administration starting in January. Texas Land Commissioner Dawn Buckingham confirmed the offer, stating that the recently purchased ranch could be used for processing, detention, and coordination of deportations. The land is to be leased for this purpose. This initiative aligns with the administration's goal of executing the largest deportation of illegal immigrants in U.S. history, with Tom Homan leading the operation.
View original story
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies struck down • 25%
Mixed rulings • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Plans upheld • 25%
Plans blocked • 25%
Plans modified • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Challenges but no injunctions • 25%
Temporary injunctions issued • 25%
Permanent injunction halting plan • 25%
Plan upheld • 25%
Plan modified • 25%
Plan blocked • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Plan fully upheld • 25%
Plan partially upheld • 25%
Plan fully blocked • 25%
Ongoing legal proceedings • 25%
Program upheld • 25%
Program partially blocked • 25%
Program fully blocked • 25%
No legal challenges • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Challenges in lower courts only • 25%
Challenges reaching appellate courts • 25%
Challenges reaching the Supreme Court • 25%
Upheld by courts • 25%
Blocked by courts • 25%
Partially blocked • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
No challenges filed • 25%
Challenges filed but not ruled • 25%
Challenges ruled in favor of the law • 25%
Challenges ruled against the law • 25%
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies partially blocked • 25%
Policies fully blocked • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Illinois • 25%
California • 25%
Other • 25%
New York • 25%