Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of legal challenges against Trump's deportation policies by December 31, 2025?
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies struck down • 25%
Mixed rulings • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Court rulings or credible legal analyses
Trump Plans Mass Deportations; Homan Threatens to Jail Mayors Defying Orders
Nov 29, 2024, 01:20 PM
President-elect Donald Trump is planning to implement mass deportations of illegal immigrants and is threatening to strip federal funding from sanctuary cities that refuse to comply with deportation orders. Trump intends to use existing laws, including the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1996 and possibly the Aliens Act of 1798, to empower local law enforcement as immigration agents. He has appointed Tom Homan as the incoming "border czar." Homan has vowed to pursue harsh measures against sanctuary cities and officials who hinder immigration authorities, warning "Don't cross that line" and stating he is willing to "put the Democratic mayor of Denver in jail" over his vow to protect migrants. Schools are bracing for upheaval over fears of mass deportations. Local sheriffs across the United States, including in Kleberg County, Texas, are gearing up to assist in the deportation efforts, training staff to identify undocumented immigrants and expressing readiness to aid federal authorities. Trump plans to redirect billions of federal dollars toward local governments that assist in deportations, while threatening to cut funding to those that do not. Sanctuary cities and Democratic leaders have pledged to resist the administration's deportation agenda, promising not to collaborate and preparing for legal challenges.
View original story
Plans upheld • 25%
Plans blocked • 25%
Plans modified • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Challenges but no injunctions • 25%
Temporary injunctions issued • 25%
Permanent injunction halting plan • 25%
Plan upheld • 25%
Plan modified • 25%
Plan blocked • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Plan fully upheld • 25%
Plan partially upheld • 25%
Plan fully blocked • 25%
Ongoing legal proceedings • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Challenges in lower courts only • 25%
Challenges reaching appellate courts • 25%
Challenges reaching the Supreme Court • 25%
Program upheld • 25%
Program partially blocked • 25%
Program fully blocked • 25%
No legal challenges • 25%
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies partially overturned • 25%
Policies fully overturned • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Upheld by courts • 25%
Blocked by courts • 25%
Partially blocked • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Operation proceeds as planned • 25%
Operation delayed • 25%
Operation scaled down • 25%
Operation halted • 25%
Proposals upheld in court • 25%
Proposals partially upheld • 25%
Proposals struck down • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Trump's policies upheld • 25%
Partial victory for advocacy groups • 25%
Complete victory for advocacy groups • 25%
Settled out of court • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increased funding for cooperation • 25%
Mixed changes • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Decreased funding for non-cooperation • 25%