Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the legal outcome of challenges to Trump's deportation plan by end of 2025?
Plan upheld • 25%
Plan modified • 25%
Plan blocked • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Court rulings or official legal documentation
Trump's Deportation Plan Targets Chicago, Involves Military and State Support
Dec 12, 2024, 12:31 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to carry out the largest deportations in U.S. history, with plans to utilize state and federal resources, including potentially the military, to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. This initiative has sparked significant concern and debate across various sectors of society. Trump's incoming Border Czar, Tom Homan, has been vocal about his intentions, particularly targeting Chicago as the epicenter for these deportations. Homan has warned that he will prosecute local officials, like Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, if they interfere with the deportations. Despite these threats, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker has expressed willingness to meet with Trump officials, emphasizing that violent criminals who are undocumented should be deported, but he questions the legal authority of Homan's position. Furthermore, 25 Republican governors, including Nevada's Joe Lombardo, have pledged support for Trump's deportation plan, indicating readiness to use state law enforcement or the National Guard to assist. However, there are concerns about the feasibility and legality of such actions, with some critics arguing that using the military for civilian law enforcement could be seen as un-American. Additionally, far-right militias have offered their services to assist with the deportations, though the incoming administration has stated it would not rely on outside groups.
View original story
Plans upheld • 25%
Plans blocked • 25%
Plans modified • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Program upheld • 25%
Program partially blocked • 25%
Program fully blocked • 25%
No legal challenges • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Challenges but no injunctions • 25%
Temporary injunctions issued • 25%
Permanent injunction halting plan • 25%
Upheld by courts • 25%
Blocked by courts • 25%
Partially blocked • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Plan upheld • 25%
Plan partially blocked • 25%
Plan fully blocked • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies struck down • 25%
Mixed rulings • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Proposals upheld in court • 25%
Proposals partially upheld • 25%
Proposals struck down • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
Policies upheld • 25%
Policies partially overturned • 25%
Policies fully overturned • 25%
Ongoing litigation • 25%
Plan fully upheld • 25%
Plan partially upheld • 25%
Plan fully blocked • 25%
Ongoing legal proceedings • 25%
No significant legal challenges • 25%
1-5 significant legal challenges • 25%
6-10 significant legal challenges • 25%
More than 10 significant legal challenges • 25%
No Challenges • 25%
Challenges but no injunctions • 25%
Injunctions but no reversals • 25%
Reversals or significant legal setbacks • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
0-5 states • 25%
16+ states • 25%
11-15 states • 25%
6-10 states • 25%