Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the U.S. response to Chinese aggression towards Taiwan by end of 2024?
Deploy additional troops • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Cyberattacks • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Official U.S. Department of Defense announcements or credible news outlets
Admiral Paparo Unveils U.S. Military's 'Hellscape' Strategy to Deter China from Attacking Taiwan
Jun 10, 2024, 05:01 PM
The U.S. military has unveiled a strategy called 'Hellscape' to deter China from attacking Taiwan. According to Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, the plan involves deploying thousands of unmanned submarines, ships, and drones in the Taiwan Strait. This strategy aims to create chaos and delay China's invasion fleet, giving the U.S. time to mount a full response. The 'Hellscape' strategy is designed to counteract Chinese President Xi Jinping's assumed plans for an invasion across the 100-mile waterway separating China and Taiwan. Paparo emphasized the importance of defending Taiwan and stated, 'I want to turn the Taiwan Strait into an unmanned hell.'
View original story
Economic sanctions against China • 33%
Increased military support for Taiwan • 33%
No significant action taken • 34%
Increased military readiness • 33%
Seek international support • 33%
Negotiation with China • 34%
Condemnation by the UN • 25%
Support from Russia or North Korea • 25%
Neutral stance by the EU • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Increase in diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Continuation of military pressure • 25%
Economic sanctions against Taiwan • 25%
No change in strategy • 25%
Increased military exercises • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic protests • 25%
Cyber attacks • 25%
Formal defense treaty • 33%
Increased military support • 33%
Continued strategic ambiguity • 34%
No conflict • 33%
Limited skirmishes • 33%
Full-scale conflict • 34%
Military drill • 33%
Economic sanctions • 33%
Diplomatic protest • 34%
US intervenes militarily • 33%
China takes military action • 33%
No significant military action • 34%
Strengthening of domestic military capabilities • 25%
Seeking stronger international alliances • 25%
Internal political changes • 25%
No significant change in policy • 25%
Neutral • 33%
Opposed • 33%
Supportive • 33%