Loading...
Market
What will be the primary reason cited by the U.S. for interest in Greenland by end of 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
National Security • 25%
Economic Interests • 25%
Environmental Concerns • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements from the U.S. government or credible news outlets
Story
Blinken Rejects Trump's Greenland Takeover for National Security, Citing No Military Force
Jan 8, 2025, 07:16 PM
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed President-elect Donald Trump's suggestion of a U.S. takeover of Greenland during a press conference in Paris, stating that it is 'obviously not a good one' and 'not going to happen.' Blinken emphasized that the U.S. achieves better results by working closely with allies rather than alienating them. This statement comes in response to Trump's recent comments where he expressed interest in acquiring Greenland for national security purposes and did not rule out the use of military force.
View original story
Similar markets
Other • 25%
Strategic military presence • 25%
Natural resource exploration • 25%
Environmental research • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Diplomatic Negotiation • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
No Action • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No action • 25%
Economic incentives • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military Action • 25%
No Action • 25%
Diplomatic Agreement • 25%
Economic Coercion • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
No significant response • 25%
No official response • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Military actions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic actions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Economic investments • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military base expansion • 25%
Trade agreements with Denmark • 25%
No significant initiatives • 25%
Environmental research projects • 25%
Opposed to sale • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Supportive of sale • 25%
No significant international action • 25%
UN intervenes diplomatically • 25%
NATO supports Denmark • 25%
EU issues sanctions against U.S. • 25%