Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of North Korea's strategy against U.S. alliances by December 31, 2025?
Increased tensions • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
New regional conflict • 25%
Reports from international diplomatic channels and news agencies
Kim Jong Un Vows 'Toughest' Anti-U.S. Strategy, Targets U.S. Alliances with South Korea and Japan
Dec 29, 2024, 09:43 AM
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has declared the nation's 'toughest' anti-U.S. strategy during a key year-end meeting of the ruling Workers' Party, state media reported. The Central Committee's plenary session, held from December 23 to 27, focused on setting policies to counter what Pyongyang perceives as increasing threats from the United States ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's inauguration. Kim criticized the U.S. as "the most reactionary state, considering anti-communism its unchanging state policy," and condemned its military cooperation with South Korea and Japan, accusing them of forming an "aggressive nuclear alliance." He called for enhancing North Korea's security interests by refining warfare tactics and accelerating the development of the defense industry to confront "shifting war attempts by enemies" and "military provocations."
View original story
Weakened alliances • 25%
Strengthened alliances with Russia • 25%
New alliances formed • 25%
No change • 25%
Agreement reached • 25%
Talks stalled • 25%
No talks held • 25%
Escalation of tensions • 25%
Increased military support • 25%
Withdrawal of troops • 25%
No change in involvement • 25%
Other • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Joint military exercises • 25%
Diplomatic talks • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military deterrence • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Increased Sanctions • 25%
Military Intervention • 25%
Diplomatic Condemnation • 25%
No Significant Response • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Military response • 25%
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic talks initiated • 25%
New conflict • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Status quo • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
Status Quo • 25%
More Diplomatic • 25%
More Aggressive • 25%
Unclear/Other • 25%
International sanctions • 25%
Deterioration of relations • 25%
Increased military aid to Russia • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Joint technological projects • 25%
Strengthened military alliance • 25%
Increased economic cooperation • 25%
No significant development • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Increased troop deployment • 25%
Withdrawal of troops • 25%
Continued engagement with no change • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increase nuclear development • 25%
Maintain current stance • 25%
Seek international alliances • 25%
Strengthen conventional forces • 25%