Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the response from South Korea, U.S., and Japan to North Korea's strategy by March 31, 2025?
Joint military exercises • 25%
Diplomatic talks • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements from government agencies or credible news sources
North Korea Declares 'Strongest' Strategy Against U.S. at Key Party Meeting Led by Kim Jong Un
Dec 28, 2024, 10:30 PM
North Korea has declared a 'strongest' response strategy toward the United States during a key ruling party meeting held from December 23 to 27, as reported by the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). The meeting, convened ahead of the new year, was presided over by North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The strategy was announced in response to the perceived expansion of military cooperation among South Korea, the U.S., and Japan into what North Korea described as a 'nuclear military bloc'. Kim Jong Un accused the U.S. of adhering to anti-communism as its national policy and labeled South Korea as an 'anti-communism outpost' for the U.S. Additionally, during the meeting, Pak Thae-song was appointed as the new premier, replacing Kim Tok-hun.
View original story
Engages in diplomatic talks • 25%
Increases military drills • 25%
Conducts missile tests • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Other • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased hostility • 25%
Diplomatic Engagement • 25%
Increased Military Drills • 25%
Cyber Attacks • 25%
Other • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Increased tensions • 25%
New regional conflict • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Increase nuclear development • 25%
Strengthen conventional forces • 25%
Seek international alliances • 25%
Maintain current stance • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic talks • 25%
Military exercises • 25%
Diplomatic Condemnation Only • 25%
Increased Military Activity • 25%
Other • 25%
No Official Response • 25%
Diplomatic Condemnation • 25%
Mediation Efforts • 25%
No Significant Action • 25%
Increased Sanctions • 25%
Neutral stance by most countries • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Military Intervention • 25%
No Significant Response • 25%
Diplomatic Condemnation • 25%
Increased Sanctions • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Increased training • 25%
Change in deployment strategy • 25%
Unknown strategy • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Military expansion • 25%
Economic development • 25%
Nuclear negotiations • 25%
Diplomatic engagement • 25%
Increased cooperation • 25%
Decreased cooperation • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
New alliance formation • 25%