What will be the international response to Iran's underground naval base in 2025?
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
Military presence increased in region • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements from international governments, verified media reports
Iran's IRGC Unveils Underground Naval Base 500 Meters Deep, Claims Ships Can Destroy U.S. Aircraft Carrier
Jan 18, 2025, 04:57 PM
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Navy has unveiled its first-ever underground naval base, referred to as an 'underground strategic base' or 'floating city', located approximately 500 meters below ground. The facility houses hundreds of missile-equipped vessels, including Zolfaghar-class ships, which the IRGC Navy commander claims can destroy an American aircraft carrier with just three vessels. The underground complex, designed to securely store the IRGC's naval assets in extensive tunnels, is virtually impervious to bunker-buster bombs. Commander-in-Chief Hossein Salami visited the strategic base, highlighting significant advancements in navigation range, vessel speed, missile range, accuracy, and destructive power. Despite the extensive tunnels, the IRGC Navy faces space shortages due to the number of vessels. The base includes combat boats specialized in targeting US warships.
View original story
Joint military exercises by Gulf states • 25%
No significant response • 25%
UN sanctions • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
Military alliances • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military posturing • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Saudi Arabia • 25%
Other • 25%
United States • 25%
Israel • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed by US • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
New sanctions by UN • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Diplomatic efforts increased • 25%
Military action considered • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Calls for negotiations • 25%
Support or neutrality • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Military actions • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Diplomatic talks initiated • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Military action • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Improved navigation systems • 25%
No significant advancements • 25%
Increased missile range • 25%
Enhanced vessel speed • 25%