What will be the international response to Iran's unveiling of new military facilities by April 30, 2025?
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Sanctions imposed by US • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
Statements from the UN, EU, US, or other major international bodies
Iran Boosts Military Drills Near Natanz, Unveils Underground Facilities Amid Tensions
Jan 7, 2025, 05:54 AM
Iran has intensified its military activities, launching a series of large-scale drills across the country, including a significant air defense exercise near the Natanz nuclear facility. The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force initiated the 'Eqtedar 1403' drills, aimed at testing readiness to protect the sensitive site from potential attacks. These exercises come amid heightened tensions with Israel and in anticipation of Donald Trump's return to power. The IRGC has nearly doubled its annual winter military exercises, with around 30 land, air, and naval drills planned across six provinces, continuing until mid-March. The drills are designed to counter new threats, with the IRGC spokesperson, Brigadier General Ali Mohammad Naeini, stating that Iran is prepared for large and complex battles on any scale. Additionally, Iran plans to unveil new underground facilities for missiles and drones during these exercises, showcasing its growing strategic capabilities.
View original story
UN sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
Joint military exercises by Gulf states • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Military alliances • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Military posturing • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Military presence increased in region • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Military action • 25%
No significant response • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
New sanctions by UN • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Support or neutrality • 25%
Calls for negotiations • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support from NATO allies • 25%
Other responses • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Military confrontation • 25%
Minimal international response • 25%
Widespread support for Israel • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Condemnation and sanctions • 25%
Military action considered • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic efforts increased • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
Exercises disrupted by external factors • 25%
Exercises completed successfully • 25%
Exercises canceled • 25%
Exercises partially completed • 25%