Loading...
Market
How will Canada's stance on India as a 'cyber adversary' change by December 31, 2025?
2
India•Canada•Canadian•Indian•Amit Shah•Sikh•Hardeep Singh Nijjar•Ministry of External Affairs•MEA•Randhir Jaiswal•Canadian High Commission•Ottawa
Resolution / Starting Odds
Canada maintains stance • 25%
Canada retracts stance • 25%
Canada intensifies stance • 25%
Other changes • 25%
Official statements from the Canadian government or credible news outlets
Story
India Protests Canada's Allegations Against Amit Shah in Nijjar Case, Warns of Serious Consequences
Nov 2, 2024, 11:33 AM
India has lodged a strong protest with Canada following allegations by Canadian officials that Indian Home Minister Amit Shah was involved in targeting Sikh separatists in Canada, including Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) of India has termed these allegations as 'absurd and baseless' and has warned of serious consequences for bilateral relations. The MEA spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, stated that the Canadian High Commission representative was summoned and a diplomatic note was handed over. The note conveyed India's strongest protest against the unfounded insinuations made by Canadian officials during the proceedings of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security in Ottawa on October 29, 2024. Additionally, India has accused Canada of placing its consular officials under audio and video surveillance, which it deems a violation of diplomatic norms. The ongoing diplomatic row has further strained India-Canada relations, with India rejecting Canada's designation of it as a 'cyber adversary' and accusing Canada of trying to discredit India on the international stage.
View original story
Similar markets
Improved relations • 25%
Further deterioration • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Other diplomatic action • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Worsened relations • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Other development • 25%
Resolution through diplomatic talks • 25%
Escalation to international arbitration • 25%
Ongoing tension without resolution • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Continued tensions • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Other • 25%
Relations improve significantly • 25%
Relations remain the same • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
Relations break down completely • 25%
Further diplomatic expulsions • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Relations improve with new agreements • 25%
Relations remain strained with no significant change • 25%
Relations deteriorate further with additional sanctions • 25%
Relations remain unchanged • 25%
Resolution and improved relations • 25%
Continued tensions without resolution • 25%
Escalation to economic sanctions • 25%
Other • 25%
Relations normalize • 25%
Continued tensions • 25%
Trade sanctions • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Diplomatic tensions increase • 25%
Severance of diplomatic ties • 25%
Relations deteriorate significantly • 25%
Relations remain unchanged • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Diplomatic ties severed • 25%
Request for international mediation • 25%
Further diplomatic expulsions • 25%
Initiation of trade restrictions • 25%
No further action • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Increased diplomatic sanctions • 25%
Continued status quo • 25%
Other • 25%