Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the Crits-Christoph et al. study controversy by end of 2024?
Study Upheld • 25%
Study Retracted • 25%
Expression of Concern Issued • 25%
Other Outcome • 25%
Official announcements or publications by the journal Cell and relevant scientific bodies
New Study Links COVID-19 Origins to Wuhan Market, Raccoon Dog DNA Found
Sep 19, 2024, 05:41 PM
A new study on the origin of COVID-19 has provided evidence supporting the theory that humans first contracted the virus from infected animals at a Chinese market in late 2019. The study, authored by Crits-Christoph et al., suggests that the virus's genetic material traced back to wildlife at the Wuhan market, including raccoon dog DNA. The findings have sparked controversy, with some scientists questioning the premises and conclusions of the study. Critics have called for an investigation into the study for possible scientific misconduct and have urged the journal Cell to issue an Expression of Editorial Concern. Despite the controversy, the study's genetic evidence indicates that the coronavirus pandemic most likely spilled over from animals in the Wuhan market.
View original story
Paper upheld without changes • 25%
Paper retracted • 25%
Paper revised • 25%
No resolution • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Widely accepted • 25%
Partially accepted • 25%
Widely refuted • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Study published • 25%
NIH takes action • 25%
Congressional hearing held • 25%
No significant outcome • 25%
Study published without consequences • 25%
Study published with consequences for Dr. Olson-Kennedy • 25%
Study remains unpublished • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
United States • 25%
European Union • 25%
China • 25%
Other • 25%
Study resumed • 25%
Study permanently shut down • 25%
Study moved to another location • 25%
Study modified and resumed • 25%
Increased vaccine skepticism • 25%
Calls for more research • 25%
Support for mRNA vaccines • 25%
Neutral/Unchanged • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Supports Wuhan Market Theory • 25%
Remains Uncertain • 25%
Supports Other Animal Market Theory • 25%
Supports Laboratory Leak Theory • 25%