Loading...
Market
What will be the U.S. government's reaction to the leak by the end of 2025?
1
Asif William Rahman•CIA•Top Secret•Sensitive Compartmented Information•Israel•Iran•Rahman•Phnom Penh•Cambodia•Israeli attack
Resolution / Starting Odds
Increased security measures • 25%
Diplomatic actions against involved parties • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Official U.S. government statements or policy changes
Story
Asif William Rahman Pleads Guilty to Leaking Classified Israeli Strike Plans on Iran, Faces Up to 10 Years
Jan 17, 2025, 06:54 PM
Asif William Rahman, a former CIA analyst who worked at the agency since 2016 and held a Top Secret clearance with access to Sensitive Compartmented Information, has pleaded guilty to leaking highly classified documents detailing Israel's military preparations for a retaliatory strike on Iran. The documents, which Rahman accessed and printed on October 17, 2024, were subsequently posted on social media platforms. Rahman, stationed at the U.S. Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, admitted to transmitting the information to individuals not authorized to receive it. His actions led to the delay of the Israeli attack. Following the leak, Rahman deleted approximately 1.5 gigabytes of data from his personal folder in the Top Secret system and was arrested in Cambodia. He faces up to 10 years in prison for two counts of willful retention and transmission of classified information related to national defense, with sentencing scheduled for May 15, 2025.
View original story
Similar markets
Public condemnation • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other actions • 25%
Call for international cybersecurity summit • 25%
Condemnation of China • 25%
Other actions or statements • 25%
No official response • 25%
Iran • 25%
United States • 25%
Israel • 25%
Other • 25%
Legal action against the leaker • 25%
No legal action taken • 25%
Legal action against Asma al-Assad • 25%
Other legal outcomes • 25%
Increased regulation • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Other • 25%
Antitrust actions • 25%
Widely Dismissed • 25%
Broadly Supported • 25%
Largely Ignored • 25%
Mixed Reactions • 25%
Diplomatic measures • 25%
Sanctions • 25%
Other • 25%
No action • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Attribution to another state actor • 25%
Attribution to Chinese APT actor • 25%
Attribution to non-state actor • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Severe diplomatic fallout • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
Public opinion remains divided • 25%
No significant public reaction • 25%
Majority believe allegations • 25%
Majority support Jay-Z and Diddy • 25%
Public inquiry or hearings • 25%
Diplomatic actions against China • 25%
New regulations on research funding • 25%
No significant action • 25%