Loading...
Market
What will be the stance of international organizations on U.S. expansionist policies by end of 2025?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
UN issues condemnation • 25%
NATO supports U.S. stance • 25%
EU remains neutral • 25%
No official stance taken • 25%
Statements or resolutions from major international organizations like the UN, NATO, or EU
Story
Trump Threatens Invasion of Panama Canal, Reiterates Desire to Buy Greenland for National Security Reasons, 100% Serious
Dec 23, 2024, 09:00 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has reiterated his desire for the United States to acquire Greenland and has threatened to take control of the Panama Canal. During recent statements, Trump described the acquisition of Greenland as an 'absolute necessity' for national security and suggested that the U.S. should consider an invasion of Panama to regain control of the canal. His remarks have sparked discussions about potential expansionist policies, raising concerns among international observers. Both the government of Greenland and Panama's president have rejected Trump's claims, indicating a lack of support for his proposals. Sources close to Trump have stated he is '100% serious' about these ambitions, which are seen as part of a broader strategy to counter perceived threats from China and Russia.
View original story
Similar markets
Formal condemnation • 25%
Support for U.S. actions • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Increased diplomatic tensions • 25%
Widespread support • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Condemnation and calls for restraint • 25%
Support for U.S. actions • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official reaction • 25%
Stronger NATO support • 25%
Weaker NATO support • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Improved relations with EU • 25%
Increased tensions • 25%
Improved alliances • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic agreements • 25%
Sanctions on Israel • 25%
Sanctions on Lebanon • 25%
Peace Talks Initiated • 25%
No Action • 25%
Supports Israel striking Iran • 25%
Supports diplomatic solutions • 25%
Supports increased U.S. military presence • 25%
No clear stance • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Other • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Call for negotiations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Strong condemnation • 25%
Mild criticism • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Supportive stance • 25%
Condemnation from UN • 25%
Support from NATO allies • 25%
Mixed international response • 25%
No official response • 25%