Loading...
Market
What will be the international reaction to U.S. territorial ambitions by June 30, 2025?
1
Resolution / Starting Odds
Formal condemnation • 25%
Support for U.S. actions • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Increased diplomatic tensions • 25%
Statements from international organizations or credible news reports
Story
Trump Demands Control of Greenland for National Security, Criticizes Panama Canal Fees
Dec 25, 2024, 04:57 AM
President-elect Donald Trump has reignited discussions about U.S. territorial ambitions by suggesting that the United States should take control of Greenland and the Panama Canal. Trump has stated that owning Greenland is an 'absolute necessity' for national security and global freedom, despite Greenland's leader firmly stating that the territory is not for sale. Regarding the Panama Canal, Trump criticized the fees charged by Panama as 'ridiculous' and threatened to demand its return to the U.S. if the situation does not change. These statements have provoked strong reactions from the leaders of Greenland and Panama, who have reaffirmed their sovereignty over their respective territories. Trump's comments have sparked international debate and criticism, highlighting tensions over territorial control and U.S. foreign policy.
View original story
Similar markets
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Calls for Diplomacy • 25%
Mixed Reactions • 25%
UN issues condemnation • 25%
NATO supports U.S. stance • 25%
EU remains neutral • 25%
No official stance taken • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Support • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Other • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Call for negotiations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support by NATO • 25%
Mixed international response • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
EU condemnation • 25%
NATO condemnation • 25%
Joint EU-NATO response • 25%
No significant international reaction • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Critical • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
General support • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support from NATO allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Other responses • 25%