What will be the outcome of North Korea's military strategy in Ukraine by end of 2025?
Significant territorial gain • 25%
High casualties with minimal gain • 25%
Withdrawal due to international pressure • 25%
Stalemate • 25%
Reports from military analysts and credible news sources
North Korea Deploys 12,000 Troops to Kursk, Suffers 4,000 Casualties as Human Mine Detectors
Jan 12, 2025, 12:00 AM
North Korean soldiers deployed to support Russia in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine are being used as 'human mine detectors' on the front lines in the Kursk region, according to Ukrainian military sources. These troops, numbering approximately 12,000, are reportedly advancing in single-file lines, spaced three to four meters apart, to detect and trigger landmines. If a soldier is killed by a mine, medics follow to collect the bodies, and the line continues. This tactic has been described as a 'meat grinder' strategy by a Ukrainian lieutenant colonel. The deployment has resulted in an estimated 4,000 casualties, as reported by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The use of such methods highlights the severe conditions and high human cost of the conflict.
View original story
Continued involvement • 25%
Increase in military presence • 25%
Other • 25%
Complete withdrawal • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Increased military support • 25%
Other significant outcome • 25%
North Korea withdraws troops • 25%
Stalemate with Ukrainian forces • 25%
Significant North Korean losses • 25%
North Korea achieves military objectives • 25%
Withdrawal without significant impact • 25%
Increased tensions with other nations • 25%
Minimal impact on conflict • 25%
Significant strategic advantage for Russia • 25%
Withdrawal of North Korean troops • 25%
Increased involvement • 25%
Decreased involvement • 25%
Complete withdrawal • 25%
No change in involvement • 25%
Peace agreement involving North Korea • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
Withdrawal of North Korean troops • 25%
Stalemate with no significant change • 25%
Other • 25%
Stalemate with current forces • 25%
Increased troop deployment • 25%
Complete withdrawal • 25%
No change in involvement • 25%
Increased military support • 25%
Withdrawal of troops • 25%
Other • 25%
UN sanctions • 25%
No incident • 25%
US sanctions • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
Other • 25%
Increased troop deployment • 25%
Withdrawal of troops • 25%
Stalemate with no significant change • 25%
Increased air support • 25%
Shift to defensive operations • 25%
Withdrawal from active combat • 25%
Continued mass infantry assaults • 25%
No change • 25%
Decrease deployment • 25%
Increase deployment • 25%
Complete withdrawal • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
International political leverage • 25%
Other • 25%
Military alliance with Russia • 25%
Economic incentives from Russia • 25%