What will be the international response to Pakistan's missile development by end of 2025?
UN sanctions • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Military deterrence measures • 25%
Official statements from the UN, NATO, or leading countries such as the US, China, or Russia
Nuclear-Armed Pakistan's Long-Range Missiles Pose Emerging Threat to U.S., White House Warns
Dec 19, 2024, 08:24 PM
A senior White House official, Deputy National Security Adviser Jon Finer, stated on Thursday that nuclear-armed Pakistan is developing long-range ballistic missile capabilities. These capabilities could eventually enable Pakistan to strike targets outside of South Asia, including the United States. Finer's comments were made during a speech at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he expressed concerns about Pakistan's missile program, describing it as an 'emerging threat' to the U.S. This development raises questions about the intentions behind Pakistan's ballistic missile program, especially in light of the deteriorating relationship between Washington and Islamabad since the U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.
View original story
Increased monitoring by IAEA • 25%
No action • 25%
Sanctions by international bodies • 25%
UN Security Council resolution • 25%
No significant action • 25%
EU sanctions • 25%
UN condemnation • 25%
Other actions • 25%
No official response • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Policy continuation • 25%
Policy suspension • 25%
Policy reduction • 25%
Policy expansion • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military response • 25%
Military action considered • 25%
Sanctions imposed • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic efforts increased • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Neutral stance by most countries • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
China • 25%
United States • 25%
India • 25%
United Kingdom • 25%
Retaliatory sanctions • 25%
Increased missile testing • 25%
No response • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
No Action • 25%
Military Action • 25%
Diplomatic Talks • 25%
Increased Sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
New sanctions imposed • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations initiated • 25%
Military action threatened • 25%
US increases military presence in Asia • 25%
Increased diplomatic tensions • 25%
New international treaty discussions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Improved relations • 25%
Strategic partnership formed • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Deteriorating relations • 25%