What will be NATO's primary response to threats from Russia and China by 2025?
Increased military presence • 25%
Enhanced diplomatic efforts • 25%
Strengthened alliances with non-NATO countries • 25%
Focus on technology and innovation • 25%
NATO official statements and strategic documents
NATO Chief Urges 'Wartime Mindset' and 3% GDP Defense Spending Target Amid Rising Global Threats
Dec 13, 2024, 07:47 AM
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has issued a stark warning to member countries, urging them to adopt a 'wartime mindset' and significantly increase their defense spending. Speaking at his first major public speech since taking charge in October, at a Carnegie Europe conference in Brussels, Rutte emphasized the need for a collective shift in mentality due to escalating global threats, particularly from Russia and China. He highlighted that the current security environment is the most precarious in his lifetime, with Russia's actions in Ukraine signaling a broader threat to Europe's freedom and way of life. Rutte called for a ramp-up in defense production and spending, suggesting that the 2% GDP defense spending target, set a decade ago, should now be considered a minimum. He warned that failure to prepare could lead to a much higher cost in the future to fight a potential war. This call to action comes as NATO's 32 members are expected to discuss raising the defense spending target to 3% of GDP by 2030 at the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague, reflecting the alliance's urgent need to address capability gaps and bolster air defenses, offensive weaponry, and nuclear deterrence. Rutte's remarks also acknowledge the influence of incoming US President Donald Trump, who has previously pushed for NATO allies to spend more on defense.
View original story
Other • 25%
Increased military presence in Eastern Europe • 25%
Enhanced cyber defense capabilities • 25%
Strengthened alliances with non-NATO countries • 25%
Joint procurement and innovation • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Undersea infrastructure protection • 25%
Conventional military capabilities • 25%
Impose new sanctions on Russia • 25%
Increase military presence in Eastern Europe • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Increase diplomatic efforts • 25%
Military intervention • 25%
Diplomatic condemnation • 25%
Increased sanctions • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Conventional forces • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Space defense • 25%
Nuclear deterrence • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Increased military presence in Eastern Europe • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Increase in military presence • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Withdrawal of support • 25%
Diplomatic measures • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Increased air patrols • 25%
Diplomatic pressure • 25%
Enhanced missile defense • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Deployment of additional troops to Eastern Europe • 25%
Increased sanctions on Russia • 25%
Conventional military forces • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Technological innovation • 25%
Joint operations • 25%
Ground forces enhancement • 25%
Naval expansion • 25%
Air and missile defense • 25%
Cybersecurity • 25%
Minor strategic changes • 25%
Significant strategic changes • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
No strategic changes • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
0-5 countries • 25%
16+ countries • 25%
11-15 countries • 25%
6-10 countries • 25%