Outcome of Denmark-U.S. discussions on Greenland security by end of 2025?
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Joint security measures • 25%
No change in current status • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Official announcements from Danish and U.S. governments
Denmark Discusses Greenland Security and U.S. Military Presence Amid Trump's Acquisition Threats
Jan 11, 2025, 01:16 PM
Denmark has sent private messages to the team of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, expressing a willingness to discuss enhancing security measures in Greenland or increasing the U.S. military presence on the island. This move comes in response to Trump's repeated statements about wanting to acquire Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, for national security purposes, including not ruling out the use of military force. The Danish government aims to address Trump's security concerns without ceding control of the island. The discussions are part of an effort to avoid a public confrontation with the incoming U.S. administration, as Trump is set to take office on January 20.
View original story
Denmark increases own military presence • 25%
Increased U.S. presence • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Reduced U.S. presence • 25%
U.S. purchases Greenland • 25%
Denmark rejects proposal • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%
Denmark rejects U.S. proposal • 25%
U.S. expands military presence • 25%
Greenland sold to U.S. • 25%
No significant change • 25%
No agreement reached • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Enhanced security agreement • 25%
Increased U.S. military presence • 25%
Greenland independence • 25%
New cooperation agreement • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Denmark strengthens defense of Greenland • 25%
Third-party mediation • 25%
Continued stalemate • 25%
U.S.-Denmark agreement on Greenland • 25%
Negotiations continue without resolution • 25%
US acquires Greenland • 25%
Denmark retains control without negotiations • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Supportive of increased U.S. presence • 25%
Other responses • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Opposed to increased U.S. presence • 25%