Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWill responsible parties for Baltic Sea infrastructure damage be publicly identified by end of 2025?
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Official statements from NATO or involved governments identifying responsible entities.
NATO Launches 'Baltic Sentry' to Protect Critical Infrastructure in Baltic Sea with New Military Assets
Jan 14, 2025, 04:40 PM
NATO has announced the launch of a new military operation named 'Baltic Sentry' aimed at enhancing security in the Baltic Sea region. This initiative comes in response to a series of incidents involving damage to critical undersea infrastructure, including power cables, telecom links, and gas pipelines. The operation will involve the deployment of frigates, maritime patrol aircraft, naval drones, and other assets to monitor and protect these vital assets. The decision was made at a summit in Helsinki attended by leaders from Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Sweden, along with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. The operation is part of NATO's ongoing efforts to increase maritime presence and surveillance in key areas, with a focus on deterring and responding to threats against critical infrastructure. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz highlighted concerns over a Russian hybrid strategy, including the use of a 'shadow fleet' of tankers. Recent incidents include damage to the Estlink-2 cable between Finland and Estonia, and the region sees about 2,000 ships daily, complicating surveillance efforts.
View original story
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Another vessel • 25%
Eagle S crew • 25%
No entity held accountable • 25%
Eagle S owner • 25%
Non-State Actor • 25%
Unknown/Other • 25%
Technical Fault • 25%
State Actor • 25%
Unknown • 25%
State actor • 25%
Accidental cause • 25%
Non-state actor • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Xin Xin Tian • 25%
Eagle S • 25%
Another vessel • 25%
No vessel identified • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Technical malfunction • 25%
Unintentional miscommunication • 25%
Deliberate provocation • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Eagle S tanker crew • 25%
Another foreign vessel • 25%
No suspect identified • 25%
Russia • 25%
No country held responsible • 25%
Other • 25%
Another country • 25%
Natural causes • 25%
Other • 25%
Accidental digging • 25%
Sabotage • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Maritime patrol aircraft encounter • 25%
No major incident • 25%
Frigate encounter • 25%
Naval drone encounter • 25%
Cyber operations • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%