Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWho will be the main actor in facilitating Turkey-Israel coordination in Syria by December 31, 2025?
United States • 25%
Russia • 25%
European Union • 25%
Direct bilateral talks • 25%
Reports from credible news agencies or official statements from involved parties
Turkey Seeks Coordination with Israeli Officials in Syria Amid PKK/YPG Assistance Requests
Dec 29, 2024, 05:19 PM
Turkish officials have reached out to Israel, requesting the establishment of a coordination mechanism similar to the one previously in place between Israel and Russian forces in Syria. Reports indicate that these communications were initiated following Turkey's military involvement in Syria. The call for coordination aims to facilitate collaboration between the Turkish and Israeli armies in the region. Additionally, there are reports that the Kurdish groups PKK and YPG, facing threats in Syria, are seeking assistance from Israel, highlighting the complex dynamics of regional alliances and conflicts.
View original story
Russia • 25%
European Union • 25%
Other • 25%
United States • 25%
Diplomatic initiative • 25%
Military cooperation • 25%
Economic cooperation • 25%
No significant outcome • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Successful mediation • 25%
Failed mediation • 25%
Continued tensions • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Increased tensions with Syrian government • 25%
Consulate not opened and relations worsen • 25%
Consulate opened but relations remain tense • 25%
Consulate not opened due to diplomatic issues • 25%
Other • 25%
Consulate opened and diplomatic relations improved • 25%
Improved relations with Syrian government • 25%
Russia • 25%
United Nations • 25%
United States • 25%
Other entity • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Partial resolution • 25%
Continued conflict • 25%
Successful peace agreement • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Other • 25%
United States • 25%
United Nations • 25%
Russia • 25%
Military cooperation agreement • 25%
Trade agreement • 25%
Diplomatic normalization • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Supporting role • 25%
Minimal involvement • 25%
No involvement • 25%
Leading role • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Formal coordination established • 25%
Coordination rejected • 25%
No cooperation • 25%
Informal cooperation only • 25%