Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will Panama's response be to U.S. actions on the Panama Canal by end of 2025?
Negotiation • 25%
Rejection • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other diplomatic action • 25%
Official statements from the Panamanian government or news reports
On Christmas, Trump Names Cuban-American Kevin Cabrera Ambassador to Panama Amid Canal 'Ripping Us Off' Claims
Dec 26, 2024, 12:41 AM
President-elect Donald Trump announced on Christmas Day the nomination of Kevin Marino Cabrera, a Cuban-American Miami-Dade County Commissioner, to serve as the United States Ambassador to Panama. Described by Trump as a "fierce fighter for America First principles," Cabrera's appointment comes amid escalating tensions over the Panama Canal, with Trump accusing Panama of "ripping us off" and recently suggesting that the U.S. should retake control of the canal. Cabrera, 34, previously managed Trump's 2020 re-election campaign in Florida and was elected to the county commission in 2022. His nomination signals Trump's intent to address issues related to the Panama Canal and assert U.S. interests in the region.
View original story
Diplomatic protest • 25%
Negotiation offer • 25%
No response • 25%
Other diplomatic action • 25%
Panama increases fees • 25%
Panama maintains current fees • 25%
Panama reduces fees • 25%
Other response • 25%
Strengthen ties with U.S. • 25%
Strengthen ties with China • 25%
Maintain neutrality • 25%
Seek other international partnerships • 25%
Reduce fees • 25%
No change in policy • 25%
Increase fees • 25%
Other diplomatic resolution • 25%
Diplomatic resolution • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Military escalation • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Reclaim control • 25%
Increase military presence • 25%
Impose economic sanctions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Support for U.S. demands • 25%
Opposition to U.S. demands • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Negotiation with the U.S. • 25%
Increase in transit fees • 25%
No change in policy • 25%
Other diplomatic actions • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. • 25%
Support for U.S. • 25%
Call for negotiations • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Renegotiation of treaty • 25%
Increased tariffs • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
No significant action • 25%
No change • 25%
Increased U.S. influence • 25%
Other impact • 25%
Decreased U.S. influence • 25%