Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the primary reason cited for Secret Service understaffing during Trump's rally by end of 2024?
Budget constraints • 25%
Personnel shortage • 25%
Administrative oversight • 25%
Other • 25%
Official reports from the Secret Service or DHS
Whistleblowers Report DHS Assigned Unprepared Personnel to Trump's Security Detail Amid Assassination Attempt
Jul 19, 2024, 02:02 PM
Whistleblowers have reported that most of former President Donald Trump's security detail at an event last Saturday was not composed of Secret Service agents. Instead, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assigned unprepared and inexperienced personnel to the task. Senator Josh Hawley highlighted this issue, raising concerns about the adequacy of the security measures in place. The incident, which occurred during an assassination attempt, has sparked questions about the intentions behind the staffing decisions, with some suggesting it may have been an intentional move to undermine Trump's safety. Additionally, reports indicate that the Secret Service was understaffed during the rally.
View original story
Assassination attempt • 25%
Credible threat • 25%
Public pressure • 25%
Other • 25%
Political motivations • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Cost considerations • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Increased security presence • 25%
Changes to rally locations • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Other • 25%
Human error • 25%
Communication failure • 25%
Security protocol lapse • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Miscommunication • 25%
Lack of preparedness • 25%
Understaffing • 25%
Other • 25%
Resource limitations • 25%
Operational errors • 25%
Intelligence failures • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Violation of campaign policies • 25%
Public backlash • 25%
Media pressure • 25%
Other • 25%
All requests granted • 25%
Some requests granted • 25%
No requests granted • 25%
Unclear outcome • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No action taken • 25%
Further investigation recommended • 25%
Disciplinary actions recommended • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%