Loading...
Market
Primary reason cited for Secret Service's failure to act by end of 2024?
2
Resolution / Starting Odds
Miscommunication • 25%
Lack of preparedness • 25%
Understaffing • 25%
Other • 25%
Official investigation reports or announcements from the Department of Homeland Security
Story
Secret Service Faces Scrutiny Over Security Lapse in Trump Assassination Attempt by Matthew Crooks
Jul 15, 2024, 02:53 PM
The U.S. Secret Service is under intense scrutiny and facing investigations following an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump. The incident has raised several questions about the agency's preparedness and response. The rooftop from which the gunman, identified as Matthew Crooks, fired shots had been previously flagged as a security risk. Despite this, the rooftop was left unguarded, and the Secret Service did not secure Trump or take him off stage in a timely manner. Local law enforcement was relied upon to secure the building, which has further fueled criticism. There are five unanswered questions, including why it took so long for snipers to take out the gunman. Random bystanders were reportedly begging the Secret Service to act. Secretary Mayorkas and the Secret Service are expected to provide answers regarding this security lapse.
View original story
Similar markets
Director resignation • 25%
Congressional hearing • 25%
Agent terminations • 25%
Policy overhaul • 25%
Human error • 25%
Communication failure • 25%
Security protocol lapse • 25%
Other • 25%
Rookie agents on critical tasks • 25%
Lack of accountability • 25%
Poor coordination with local law enforcement • 25%
Technology failures • 25%
Personnel changes • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
Training enhancements • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
Resignations • 25%
Criminal charges • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Department of Homeland Security • 25%
Congress • 25%
Department of Justice • 25%
Other • 25%
Internal miscommunication • 25%
Resource limitations • 25%
Procedural failures • 25%
Other reason • 25%
Budget constraints • 25%
Personnel shortage • 25%
Administrative oversight • 25%
Other • 25%
Major reforms recommended • 25%
Minor reforms recommended • 25%
No significant issues found • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Major policy changes • 25%
Leadership changes • 25%
Increased training and protocols • 25%
Increase in physical requirements • 25%
Increase in training requirements • 25%
Reevaluation of diversity quotas • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Admit fault • 25%
Deny fault • 25%
Announce internal review • 25%
No official response • 25%