Loading...
Market
What will be the primary legal argument used by the higher court in the final ruling on Biden's Title IX LGBTQ protections by the end of 2024?
3
Resolution / Starting Odds
Federal authority • 25%
State rights • 25%
Constitutional protections • 25%
Other legal grounds • 25%
Court rulings and legal documentation
Story
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Biden's Title IX LGBTQ Protections in Four States
Jul 3, 2024, 05:55 PM
A federal judge in Kansas, John Broomes, a Trump appointee, has temporarily blocked the Biden administration from enforcing new anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ students and healthcare patients. The ruling affects four Republican-led states: Kansas, Alaska, Utah, and Wyoming. The states, along with three conservative activist groups, sued the administration, arguing it lacked the authority to adopt such regulations. The judge's order also extends to any school nationwide where members of Young America's Foundation or the children of Moms for Liberty attend. The blocked protections are part of the administration's Title IX rule.
View original story
Similar markets
Uphold the rewrite • 25%
Strike down the rewrite • 25%
Remand to lower court • 25%
No decision by end of 2024 • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Preliminary injunction upheld, permanent injunction granted • 25%
Preliminary injunction upheld, permanent injunction denied • 25%
Preliminary injunction overturned • 25%
Settlement reached • 25%
Biden Administration • 25%
Any of the 10 Republican-led states • 25%
Supreme Court • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Protections Increased • 33%
Protections Decreased • 33%
No Change • 33%
Upheld by courts • 25%
Blocked by courts • 25%
Passed by Congress • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%