Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of the House Oversight Committee's investigation into FEMA by June 30, 2025?
Policy confirmed • 25%
Policy refuted • 25%
No conclusive outcome • 25%
Investigation canceled • 25%
Official report or press release from the House Oversight Committee
FEMA Fires Marn'i Washington for Skipping Trump Supporters' Homes; Policy Extended to Carolinas
Nov 12, 2024, 04:14 PM
After Hurricane Milton struck Florida, a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) employee, Marn'i Washington, was fired for directing disaster relief workers to avoid providing assistance to homes displaying signs supporting President-elect Donald Trump. Washington instructed her team to skip homes with Trump campaign signs, a directive communicated both verbally and through leaked internal messages, causing public outrage. FEMA Administrator released a statement on Saturday confirming her termination, stating that her actions violated the agency's principles. The House Oversight Committee has called on the FEMA director to testify regarding the incident. Washington claims the practice was not isolated, alleging that the avoidance policy was also implemented in the Carolinas due to verbal abuse from Trump supporters. She asserts she was made a 'patsy' by the agency. Calls for investigations have been made, with officials demanding accountability and transparency from FEMA.
View original story
Charges recommended • 25%
No charges, policy changes recommended • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other • 25%
No bias found • 25%
Bias found, no action recommended • 25%
Bias found, action recommended • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No evidence of discrimination • 25%
Evidence of isolated incidents • 25%
Evidence of widespread practice • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No further action • 25%
Policy changes • 25%
Disciplinary actions • 25%
Legal proceedings • 25%
Policy change recommended • 25%
No further action • 25%
Disciplinary action against others • 25%
Other • 25%
Bias confirmed • 25%
No bias found • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Policy recommendations issued • 25%
Funding adjustments made • 25%
Leadership changes mandated • 25%
No action recommended • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%
Disciplinary action recommended • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No significant issues found • 25%
Minor issues with recommendations • 25%
Major issues requiring overhaul • 25%
Investigation ongoing • 25%
No evidence found • 25%
Isolated incident confirmed • 25%
Systemic issue found • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Disciplinary actions recommended • 25%
Policy changes recommended • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor procedural errors found • 25%
Significant misconduct found • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Majority oppose FEMA • 25%
No significant opinion • 25%
Majority support FEMA • 25%
Split opinion • 25%