Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the outcome of Meta's 'Notas de contexto' in the US by mid-2025?
Successful implementation • 25%
Partial success • 25%
Failure • 25%
Abandoned • 25%
Meta's reports or major news outlets
EU Rejects Zuckerberg's Censorship Claims, Continues Fact-Checking Amid US Changes
Jan 8, 2025, 02:10 PM
The European Union has categorically rejected accusations of censorship made by Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, following his announcement that the company would end its digital fact-checking program in the United States. The EU emphasized that content moderation does not equate to censorship, highlighting that the Digital Services Act (DSA) focuses on freedom of expression while requiring the removal of illegal content. Zuckerberg's comments came after a dinner with U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, and he criticized EU laws, including the Digital Markets Law (DML) and Digital Services Law (DSL), as institutionalizing censorship. The EU's response was firm, with spokesperson Paula Pinho stating that the bloc categorically rejects any accusation of censorship on its part. Meanwhile, Meta has confirmed it will continue fact-checking in the European Union, including in countries like the Netherlands, and will replace its U.S. fact-checking with a 'Notas de contexto' system similar to that used by X.
View original story
Mostly Positive • 25%
Indifferent • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Mostly Negative • 25%
Equal Impact Across Platforms • 25%
Facebook • 25%
Instagram • 25%
Threads • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Backfires with negative consequences • 25%
Moderately successful with some benefits • 25%
Unsuccessful with no clear benefits • 25%
Successful with clear policy benefits • 25%
Increased influence • 25%
Decreased influence • 25%
No change • 25%
Backlash • 25%
Abandoned initiative • 25%
Partial success • 25%
Successful implementation • 25%
No significant progress • 25%
21-30 countries • 25%
31+ countries • 25%
0-10 countries • 25%
11-20 countries • 25%
Mixed reaction • 25%
Negative reaction • 25%
Positive reaction • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
Meta wins the trial • 25%
Trial ends in settlement • 25%
Trial is extended into 2026 • 25%
Meta loses the trial • 25%
Lack of Effectiveness • 25%
Bias in Notes • 25%
Privacy Concerns • 25%
Complexity of Use • 25%
Monopoly practices • 25%
Censorship accusations • 25%
Other • 25%
Privacy concerns • 25%