Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be the international response to U.S. sanctions against ICC by end of 2025?
Widespread support • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Official statements from international bodies or verified reports in major news outlets
ICC Prosecutor Defends War Crimes Allegations Against Netanyahu and Gallant, Amid U.S. Sanctions
Jan 17, 2025, 10:31 AM
International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Karim Khan has defended his decision to bring war crimes allegations against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, asserting that Israel has made 'no real effort' to investigate the allegations itself. Khan's comments were made in the context of arrest warrants issued by ICC judges in November of the previous year for Netanyahu, former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Ibrahim Al-Masri, related to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. Despite a vote by the U.S. House of Representatives to sanction the ICC in protest, which Khan described as 'unwanted and unwelcome', he emphasized the ICC's role as a court of last resort. Khan expressed hope that Israel would demonstrate a willingness to investigate, even after the warrants were issued, but noted that Israel has rejected the jurisdiction of the ICC and denies the allegations of war crimes. The United States, Israel's main ally, is not a member of the ICC and has criticized the arrest warrants against Netanyahu and Gallant.
View original story
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant reaction • 25%
General support • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Mixed • 25%
Support • 25%
Condemnation • 25%
Neutral • 25%
EU imposes sanctions • 25%
No major sanctions imposed • 25%
Russia imposes sanctions • 25%
China imposes sanctions • 25%
Minimal reaction • 25%
General support • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Widespread condemnation • 25%
Sanctions not imposed • 25%
Other • 25%
Sanctions imposed and ICC resists • 25%
Sanctions imposed and ICC complies • 25%
Condemn ICC decision • 25%
Support ICC decision • 25%
No official response • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Opposed • 25%
No official response • 25%
Legal action against the U.S. • 25%
No official response • 25%
Other response • 25%
Condemnation of U.S. actions • 25%
Sanctions withdrawn • 25%
Sanctions implemented • 25%
Sanctions blocked • 25%
Sanctions delayed • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Continues rejection • 25%
Seeks international mediation • 25%
Accepts jurisdiction • 25%
Negotiates terms • 25%