Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be NATO's stance on U.S. interest in Greenland by end of 2025?
Support U.S. interests • 25%
Oppose U.S. interests • 25%
Remain neutral • 25%
No official response • 25%
Official NATO statements or credible reports from international news agencies
Trump Calls for U.S. Control of Greenland, Citing National Security Needs as 'Absolute Necessity'
Dec 23, 2024, 06:38 AM
President-elect Donald Trump has called for the United States to acquire Greenland, asserting that ownership of the island is an 'absolute necessity' for national security and freedom. In a series of statements, Trump emphasized that the U.S. feels the need for control over Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, to ensure security interests both domestically and globally. He stated, 'For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World, the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity.' This position revives discussions from his previous administration when he expressed interest in purchasing the territory, which was met with resistance from Denmark. Trump's remarks have reignited the debate over Greenland's strategic importance, particularly in light of its vast natural resources, including rare earth minerals essential for modern technology.
View original story
Strengthens ties with Denmark • 25%
Seeks new alliances • 25%
Seeks UN support • 25%
No change in alliances • 25%
Formal negotiations initiated • 25%
Greenland reaffirms sovereignty • 25%
UN intervention • 25%
No significant developments • 25%
Support from major allies • 25%
Opposition from major allies • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
No official response • 25%
Denmark • 25%
Canada • 25%
United Kingdom • 25%
Other • 25%
Formal purchase proposal • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other diplomatic outcomes • 25%
Supportive • 25%
Neutral • 25%
Opposed • 25%
Other • 25%
Military presence increase • 25%
Diplomatic negotiations • 25%
Economic investments • 25%
No significant actions • 25%
Stronger NATO support • 25%
Weaker NATO support • 25%
Neutral stance • 25%
Improved relations with EU • 25%
Rejection of sale • 25%
Negotiation for sale • 25%
Increased cooperation without sale • 25%
No response • 25%
Support U.S. Offer • 25%
Oppose U.S. Offer • 25%
Remain Neutral • 25%
No Official Statement • 25%
Alliance with U.S. • 25%
Alliance with Denmark • 25%
Independent stance • 25%
Other alliances • 25%
Denmark rejects proposal • 25%
No significant change • 25%
U.S. purchases Greenland • 25%
Greenland gains more autonomy • 25%