Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitWhat will be Matthew Whitaker's impact on US-NATO relations by December 31, 2025?
Strengthened relations • 25%
Weakened relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
Analysis from international relations experts or reports from NATO
Trump Appoints Loyalist Matthew Whitaker, Lacking Foreign Policy Experience, as Ambassador to NATO
Nov 20, 2024, 04:00 PM
President-elect Donald Trump has nominated Matthew Whitaker, a former Acting Attorney General from Iowa and loyal supporter, as the United States Ambassador to NATO. The announcement was made on Wednesday. Whitaker, who previously served as a US Attorney for the Southern District of Iowa, lacks foreign policy experience but is praised by Trump for his strength, integrity, and patriotism. Trump's statement emphasized that Whitaker 'will ensure the United States’ interests are advanced and defended' and 'He will put AMERICA FIRST.' The appointment signals Trump's intent to prioritize American interests within the alliance he has frequently criticized. Whitaker's nomination reinforces the administration's 'America First' approach as he is expected to strengthen relationships with NATO allies while advancing and defending US interests.
View original story
Handled diplomatically • 25%
Escalated tensions • 25%
No response • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Strengthened NATO • 25%
Weakened NATO • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other impact • 25%
Increased support for NATO • 25%
Maintained current stance • 25%
Threatened withdrawal • 25%
Reduced support for NATO • 25%
None • 25%
1 to 5 • 25%
6 to 10 • 25%
More than 10 • 25%
Improvement • 25%
Deterioration • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Too early to tell • 25%
Improved Relations • 25%
Deteriorated Relations • 25%
No Significant Change • 25%
Other • 25%
United Kingdom • 25%
Germany • 25%
France • 25%
Other • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Strained relations • 25%
Unclear impact • 25%
Increased role • 25%
Decreased role • 25%
No change • 25%
Withdrawal from NATO • 25%
NATO reduces involvement • 25%
NATO increases involvement • 25%
NATO maintains current role • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Increase in defense spending • 25%
Other • 25%
Focus on cybersecurity • 25%
Reduction in US troop presence • 25%