Loading...
Market
US federal response to New York's secession proposal by end of 2025
1
New York State•Liz Krueger•Senate Finance Committee•United States•Canada•Donald Trump•Krueger•Connecticut•Massachusetts•Vermont•New York•Trump
Resolution / Starting Odds
Federal negotiation • 25%
Legal action • 25%
No response • 25%
Other • 25%
Official statements and actions from the US federal government
Story
NY Senate Finance Chair Liz Krueger Proposes Secession to Canada, Withholding $360 Billion to Counter Trump
Nov 28, 2024, 01:49 PM
New York State Senator Liz Krueger, the Chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has proposed that New York State secede from the United States and join Canada as a new province in response to President-elect Donald Trump's planned immigration policies, including mass deportations. Krueger suggests that other northeastern states such as Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Vermont join in seceding and forming part of Canada. She also proposes that New York could withhold its $360 billion in federal tax revenue to counter Trump's presidency.
View original story
Similar markets
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed responses • 25%
No official stance • 25%
Increased support • 25%
Decreased support • 25%
No change in support • 25%
Other response • 25%
Increased federal presence • 25%
New federal regulations • 25%
State-led initiatives • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Increased monitoring and tracking • 25%
Deployment of counter-drone measures • 25%
Public safety advisories • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Federal Funding Cuts • 25%
Regulatory Actions • 25%
Legal Challenges • 25%
Other • 25%
Legal action • 25%
Funding cuts • 25%
Policy change • 25%
No action • 25%
Canada becomes a U.S. state • 25%
Proposal formally rejected • 25%
Proposal under consideration • 25%
No formal action taken • 25%
Majority support • 25%
Majority oppose • 25%
Mixed opinions • 25%
No significant opinion • 25%
Supportive response • 25%
Critical response • 25%
Neutral response • 25%
No response • 25%
Legal action against cities • 25%
Negotiations with cities • 25%
Increased federal enforcement • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Legislative action • 25%
Regulatory changes • 25%
Increased enforcement • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Federal legal action • 25%
Withdrawal of federal funding • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Negotiations initiated • 25%