Loading...
Loading...
Browse all stories on DeepNewz
VisitPrimary responsibility for Akshay Shinde's death according to CID investigation by December 31, 2024?
Akshay Shinde • 25%
Police officers • 25%
Government officials • 25%
Other • 25%
Official CID report or statement
Akshay Shinde's Death in Police Encounter Sparks Political Controversy; CID to Investigate
Sep 24, 2024, 03:42 AM
The death of Akshay Shinde, the accused in the Badlapur sexual assault case, has sparked significant political controversy in Maharashtra. Shinde, who was accused of sexually assaulting two minor girls, was shot dead by police while being transported for an investigation. The incident has led to widespread protests and accusations from opposition parties, who claim that the government and police mishandled the case and protected the accused. Maharashtra Congress president Nana Patole and NCP-SCP MP Supriya Sule have criticized the government's approach, citing delays in filing the FIR and the suspicious circumstances of Shinde's death. The police claim that Shinde attempted to snatch a revolver, prompting them to act in self-defense. The Maharashtra government has formed an eight-member team to investigate the incident. The CID is also investigating the killing. Meanwhile, BJP leaders have defended the police action, arguing that it was necessary for self-defense and questioning the opposition's stance. Shinde's mother has alleged that his death was part of a 'big conspiracy.' The police officer involved had worked with a top encounter specialist.
View original story
Police found culpable • 25%
Police exonerated • 25%
Inconclusive results • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
No one • 25%
Individual police officer(s) • 25%
Thane Police Department • 25%
Other • 25%
Maharashtra State Police • 25%
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) • 25%
Judicial Inquiry • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Justified encounter • 25%
Unjustified encounter • 25%
Inconclusive • 25%
Other • 25%
Individual officers • 25%
Higher police officials • 25%
No one held responsible • 25%
Other entities • 25%
Justified self-defense • 25%
Excessive use of force • 25%
Procedural errors • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
Self-defense confirmed • 25%
Excessive force used • 25%
Procedural errors identified • 25%
No conclusion • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Senior officer • 25%
Junior officers • 25%
All officers equally • 25%
None held responsible • 25%
Widespread support for police action • 25%
Widespread condemnation of police action • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
Minimal public reaction • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Other • 25%
Self-defense by police • 25%
Police misconduct • 25%
Insufficient evidence • 25%