Loading...
Market
Outcome of Boissonnault’s business associates inquiry?
4
Canadian House of Commons•Canada•Bloc Quebecois•Green Party•Elizabeth May•Mike Morrice•Greens•NDP•Jagmeet Singh•NSICOP•Justin Trudeau•Conservative•Pierre Poilievre•House of Commons•Randy Boissonnault
Resolution / Starting Odds
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor infractions found • 25%
Major infractions found • 25%
Inconclusive findings • 25%
Official report or announcement from the parliamentary ethics committee
Story
Canada's House of Commons Votes 320-2 to Investigate Foreign Interference
Jun 13, 2024, 08:11 PM
The Canadian House of Commons has overwhelmingly voted in favor of a motion to investigate allegations of foreign interference in Canada's democratic institutions. The motion, proposed by the Bloc Quebecois, passed with 320 votes in favor and only 2 against, with the Green Party's Elizabeth May and Mike Morrice being the dissenting votes. All parties except for the Greens supported the motion. Additionally, MPs across party lines have called on Justice Marie-Josée Hogue to investigate allegations that current and former parliamentarians have collaborated with hostile foreign governments. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh expressed alarm after reading an unredacted report on foreign interference by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), accusing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of inaction and criticizing Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre for his apparent disinterest in the issue. The House of Commons also gave final approval to a comprehensive bill aimed at combating foreign interference. The parliamentary ethics committee has also passed a motion to have cabinet minister Randy Boissonnault’s business associates testify in an extended meeting.
View original story
Similar markets
Guilty • 33%
Not Guilty • 33%
Investigation Inconclusive • 33%
Deal Approved • 33%
Deal Rejected • 33%
Investigation Inconclusive • 33%
Recommendations for further reforms • 33%
No substantial findings • 33%
Calls for resignation of involved lawmakers • 34%
No violation found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 33%
Cleared of all allegations • 25%
Found guilty of some allegations • 25%
Found guilty of all allegations • 25%
Investigation inconclusive • 25%
No action taken • 33%
Formal reprimand to executive leadership • 33%
Legislative changes to executive compensation transparency • 34%
No major issues found • 33%
Minor issues and recommendations • 33%
Major issues and significant recommendations • 34%
No wrongdoing found • 25%
Minor policy violations found • 25%
Significant ethical violations found • 25%
Criminal activity uncovered • 25%
No violations found • 33%
Minor violations found • 33%
Major violations found • 34%
No Violation Found • 33%
Minor Violation Found • 33%
Major Violation Found • 33%
No substantial evidence found • 33%
Substantial evidence found • 33%
Investigation inconclusive • 33%