What will be the role of NGOs and UN in U.S. border management by end of 2025?
Increased involvement • 25%
Decreased involvement • 25%
No change • 25%
Other • 25%
Reports and statements from NGOs, the UN, and U.S. government agencies
Trump Plans Executive Actions to Remove 30+ Million Aliens and Address Historic Illegal Immigration Post-Election
Dec 18, 2024, 11:48 PM
Following the recent U.S. presidential election, discussions surrounding immigration policy and border security have intensified. Former President Donald Trump is expected to prioritize executive actions aimed at curbing mass immigration and initiating the removal of over 30 million undocumented immigrants upon taking office. Critics of President Biden's administration, including former Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) director Tom Homan, have highlighted what they describe as a deliberate effort to 'unsecure' the southern border, suggesting that this policy shift has led to historic levels of illegal immigration. Homan emphasized the need for oversight and accountability regarding the involvement of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the United Nations in border management, asserting that the current situation represents a significant national security vulnerability. He also suggested that the Biden administration's approach may be politically motivated, speculating that the administration hopes to gain future Democratic voters from the immigrant population. Homan's remarks indicate a belief that the increase in illegal immigration is not merely a result of mismanagement but rather a policy designed to create a more open border environment.
View original story
UN found responsible • 25%
Neither found responsible • 25%
Both found responsible • 25%
NGOs found responsible • 25%
Central American countries • 25%
Canada • 25%
Mexico • 25%
Other or no assistance • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Other • 25%
Drug Trafficking • 25%
Immigration Control • 25%
Human Trafficking • 25%
No significant change in illegal migration • 25%
Inconclusive results • 25%
Increase in illegal migration • 25%
Significant decrease in illegal migration • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Partial support • 25%
Logistical support only • 25%
No involvement • 25%
Full deployment • 25%
No cooperation • 25%
Low cooperation with minimal interaction • 25%
Moderate cooperation with information sharing • 25%
High cooperation with joint operations • 25%
Increase in illegal migration • 25%
No change in illegal migration levels • 25%
Significant reduction in illegal migration • 25%
Moderate reduction in illegal migration • 25%
Investigation not launched • 25%
Investigation launched • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Investigation completed • 25%
Department of Health and Human Services • 25%
Other • 25%
Department of Homeland Security • 25%
Federal Bureau of Investigation • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Reforming asylum policies • 25%
Other • 25%
Deportation of undocumented immigrants • 25%
Strengthening border security • 25%