What will be the primary reason cited for the US Marine relocation from Okinawa by end of 2025?
Regional security concerns • 25%
Local community pressure • 25%
Strategic military realignment • 25%
Other • 25%
Statements from US Department of Defense or related press releases
US Marines Begin Relocation from Okinawa to Guam's Camp Braz, 19 Years After Agreement
Dec 14, 2024, 10:16 AM
The relocation of U.S. Marine Corps personnel from Okinawa Prefecture to Guam has commenced, marking the first significant move under an agreement made between Japan and the United States 19 years ago in 2005. The transfer began with an advance team of approximately 100 logistics support personnel from the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Force, with the goal of reducing the burden on local communities in Okinawa while maintaining the deterrence capabilities of the U.S.-Japan alliance. The relocation plan includes moving over 4,000 Marines to Guam, with the total number of personnel to be reduced in Okinawa to about 10,000. The U.S. military has stated that the relocation signifies the first phase of moving Marines to locations outside of Japan, with subsequent phases to follow. The move is part of a broader realignment strategy to distribute U.S. military presence in the region more evenly, particularly in light of regional security concerns involving China. The personnel will be stationed at the new base, Camp Braz, on Guam. Defense Minister Gen Nakatani conveyed the start of the transfer to Nago Mayor Taketoyo Toguchi, who welcomed the move. The Marines being relocated are mainly from the 3rd Marine Expeditionary Brigade at Camp Courtney, the 4th Marine Regiment at Camp Schwab, and the Combat Logistics Battalion 4 at Camp Foster.
View original story
Domestic political factors • 25%
U.S. pressure • 25%
North Korean threats • 25%
Chinese military activities • 25%
New strategic deployments • 25%
Decrease in presence • 25%
No change • 25%
Increase in presence • 25%
Support for Eastern European allies • 25%
Other strategic interests • 25%
Counterterrorism operations • 25%
Deterrence against Russia • 25%
Syrian government request • 25%
Political pressure • 25%
Economic reasons • 25%
Strategic interests • 25%
Counter Turkey • 25%
Counter ISIS • 25%
Support SDF • 25%
Other • 25%
No change • 25%
Decrease in presence • 25%
Increase in presence • 25%
Other • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Indian Ocean region security • 25%
Other • 25%
Counter-terrorism • 25%
Middle East operations • 25%
Military Exercises • 25%
Economic Sanctions • 25%
No Significant Response • 25%
Diplomatic Protest • 25%
Resource constraints • 25%
Security concerns • 25%
Political strategy • 25%
Other • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Increase by less than 1,000 • 25%
Increase by more than 2,000 • 25%
No increase • 25%
Increase by 1,000 to 2,000 • 25%