What will be the primary impact of the cartel FTO designation on US-Mexico relations by end of 2025?
Increased military tension • 25%
Enhanced cooperation on drug trafficking • 25%
Strained economic relations • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Analysis from diplomatic experts or reports in credible international relations publications
Trump Labels Mexican Cartels as Terrorist Groups, Raises Military and Economic Concerns
Jan 27, 2025, 01:24 PM
President Donald Trump has signed an executive order designating Mexican drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). This move grants the United States broader legal authority to combat these groups, potentially allowing for unilateral military actions and stricter sanctions. The decision has sparked significant debate over its implications for U.S.-Mexico relations, with concerns about legal, diplomatic, and ethical challenges. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has expressed a commitment to defending Mexico's sovereignty and is analyzing the economic and political consequences of this designation. Critics argue that the classification risks destabilizing Mexico, straining bilateral cooperation, and infringing on Mexican sovereignty. Proponents see it as a necessary step to address the threat posed by cartels, equating their activities to those of terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda. The designation also raises questions about its impact on cross-border trade, regional security, and human rights. Mexico is reportedly preparing a security plan to address these challenges and collaborate with the U.S. on reducing violence and drug trafficking. Stephen Miller, a key architect of Trump's policies, played a significant role in shaping this decision. The classification could also have economic impacts, particularly for businesses inadvertently linked to these organizations.
View original story
New diplomatic agreement • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Worsened relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Relations remain stable • 25%
Relations severely deteriorate • 25%
Condemnation by UN • 25%
Support by a major ally • 25%
Mixed reactions • 25%
No significant international response • 25%
Economic sanctions • 25%
Military action • 25%
Increased border security • 25%
No significant action • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Decreased cooperation • 25%
Deterioration of relations • 25%
Unchanged cooperation • 25%
Increased cooperation • 25%
New bilateral agreements • 25%
Significant joint operations • 25%
No significant changes • 25%
Increased intelligence sharing • 25%
Increased military presence • 25%
Other measures • 25%
No significant change • 25%
New bilateral agreements with the U.S. • 25%
Blocked by courts • 25%
Rescinded by Trump • 25%
Implemented without changes • 25%
Implemented with modifications • 25%
Decrease in political assassinations • 25%
Increase in political assassinations • 25%
No significant change • 25%
Other impacts • 25%
Continued negotiations • 25%
Agreement on joint action • 25%
No significant outcome • 25%
Disagreement and tension • 25%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Legal action against the US • 25%
No significant response • 25%
Diplomatic protest • 25%
Increased security collaboration • 25%