What will be the outcome of Tower Hamlets' opposition to China's mega-embassy by end of 2025?
Project proceeds with modifications • 25%
Project proceeds without changes • 25%
Project halted permanently • 25%
Project delayed for further review • 25%
Official decisions or announcements by Tower Hamlets Council or related legal proceedings
UK Ministers David Lammy and Yvette Cooper Support China's Mega-Embassy at Royal Mint Site Despite Security Concerns
Jan 16, 2025, 10:48 AM
UK ministers David Lammy and Yvette Cooper have signaled support for China's proposed mega-embassy in London, according to a letter to the Planning Inspectorate for England seen by the Financial Times. The proposed diplomatic complex is set to be built on the former Royal Mint site. The ministers have outlined conditions for the project, emphasizing the importance of both the UK and China having functioning diplomatic premises. This move comes despite objections from the Metropolitan Police and concerns raised by UK intelligence agencies regarding security risks associated with the embassy's location near vital communication cables and a major transport artery. The development has also faced opposition from Tower Hamlets, which unanimously ruled against the project. Critics argue that the embassy could be used for spying and targeting activists in the UK, highlighting the government's apparent disregard for local and security concerns in favor of diplomatic relations with China.
View original story
Indifferent • 25%
Mostly positive • 25%
Mostly negative • 25%
Mixed • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
New laws enacted • 25%
Increased monitoring and surveillance • 25%
Diplomatic actions against China • 25%
New Legislation Passed • 25%
Increased Diplomatic Measures • 25%
No Significant Action • 25%
Formal Investigation Launched • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other outcomes • 25%
Legislative action proposed • 25%
Inquiry initiated • 25%
Other • 25%
Spy expelled from UK • 25%
Diplomatic tensions rise • 25%
No significant action taken • 25%
Formal Diplomatic Actions Taken • 25%
Improved Relations • 25%
Strained Relations • 25%
Status Quo Maintained • 25%
Relations improve • 25%
Other • 25%
Relations worsen • 25%
No change • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Continued Tensions • 25%
Escalated to EU Level • 25%
Other Outcome • 25%
Resolved Amicably • 25%
Increased public debate • 25%
Improved PP popularity • 25%
No significant impact • 25%
Government policy change • 25%
Severe diplomatic fallout • 25%
Status quo maintained • 25%
Deteriorated relations • 25%
Improved relations • 25%
No action taken • 25%
Other outcome • 25%
Deportation or expulsion • 25%
Formal charges filed • 25%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
No • 50%
No • 50%
Yes • 50%
Concerns mitigated with measures • 25%
Project cancelled due to concerns • 25%
Project altered significantly • 25%
Concerns ignored • 25%